For pharmacy teams

Bring the evidence to your judgement.

Keep the patient’s words, the information still missing and your assessment in view, with a clear distinction between each.

Editorial illustration of two professionals considering information together.

Evidence before decisions

A clearer starting point for your review.

Collected information is useful when you can understand where it came from and what it does not tell you. A short summary alone cannot show every uncertainty, declined question or detail that needs a second look.

Hannah Health brings structured answers alongside their source evidence. Your assessment remains separate, so it is clear which information was collected and which decision was made by the reviewing pharmacist.

The workspace supports the organisation of review work. It does not make a diagnosis, change medicines, authorise a prescription or replace the clinical context and judgement your service requires.

The pharmacist’s workspace

Keep the important distinctions.

Source

The answer in its context

Trace collected information back to the original evidence and the question it supports. A source link helps you inspect the detail before deciding how it informs your assessment.

Uncertainty

Unknown stays unknown

Missing, unknown and declined answers have distinct states. An incomplete answer is not converted into a reassuring finding simply because a conversation has finished.

Assessment

A decision with an author

Record your assessment and next steps separately from collected information. Review note versions before approval, with the history retained as the work develops.

Follow-through

Actions that stay visible

Assign the next action and retain it until it has been explicitly resolved. A signed note and a closed follow-up are different milestones.

Room for a human conversation

Sometimes the next step is to ask more.

Not every record will contain enough information to support the review. An answer may be unclear, a person may decline a question, or a communication need may mean that collection should pause.

Hannah keeps those limitations visible and supports an owned human handover. The pharmacist decides what further context or contact is needed within the agreed service pathway.

How clinical oversight works

Three separate questions

  • What information has been collected, and from where?
  • What is my assessment, with the required clinical context?
  • What still needs to happen, and who owns it?

Keeping these questions separate helps the record explain the work, without asking a single “complete” label to mean everything.

Current product stage

The working application is being developed and evaluated using synthetic records. Patient-facing operation needs separate clinical, information-governance and provider acceptance. Product imagery shows the current local workspace, not a live patient service.

A conversation about your team

Make room for a better review.

Explore how Hannah could support your medication-review workflow.

The Plum Folio workspace

Current application interface · fictional demonstration data, not measured customer results.

Current Hannah Health overview with labelled demonstration records, completed reviews and owned follow-up.